Saturday, 30 December 2023

“A Post Mortem on the Gino Case”: a hot mess, P. 2 (En)

A followup from the New Yorker to the previous post.
Ugh, yikes! Yet there are lots of folks (see the Harward Crimson remarks, for example) who defend her practices. Funny that.
One former graduate student thought that she caught Gino plagiarizing portions of a literature review, but tried to convince herself that it was an honest error. Later, in a study for a different paper, “Gino was, like, ‘I had an idea for an additional experiment that would tie everything together, and I already collected the data and wrote it up—here are the results.’ ” The former graduate student added, “My adviser was, like, ‘Did you design the study together? No. Did you know it was going to happen? No. Has she sent you the data? No. Something off is happening here.’ ” (Gino declined to address these allegations on the record.) ©

No comments :

Post a Comment