Friday, 2 May 2025
Wednesday, 30 April 2025
“Harsh Sentences: H. P. Lovecraft v. Ernest Hemingway”: a brilliant comparative essay from Deepcuts
For H. P. Lovecraft, missing Hemingway would have been much more difficult—nor did he. Though they were very different in their fictional focus, output, and success, Lovecraft and Hemingway were still contemporaries, and there are a number of references to Hemingway and his works in Lovecraft’s letters. These mentions of Ernest Hemingway, who had not yet become “Papa” of later years, reflect more on Lovecraft than on Hemingway himself, but show Lovecraft both coming to grips with a Modern writer of very different style and interests and how Hemingway’s influence spread.
Trends come from deeper sources than what is written on the surface of literature, and the average domestic adjustments of 1980 or 2030 will not depend on the question of whether Ernest Hemingway is suppressed or encouraged in 1930.
—H. P. Lovecraft to Maurice W. Moe, June 1930?, LMM 267
Tuesday, 29 April 2025
Monday, 28 April 2025
Nothings and triviality
Sunday, 27 April 2025
Saturday, 26 April 2025
Friday, 25 April 2025
...и немножко нервно
Thursday, 24 April 2025
Wednesday, 23 April 2025
Tuesday, 22 April 2025
Monday, 21 April 2025
Sunday, 20 April 2025
Пасха-2025
Saturday, 19 April 2025
Holy Saturday: Orthodox Eve
Friday, 18 April 2025
Holy Friday
Thursday, 17 April 2025
Within these collections and exhibitions are the icons of Eastern Orthodoxy – those haunting faces of Christ, the Virgin and saints, anonymously executed in the monasteries of the ancient Christian East – and precious refractions of a vast inheritance that we will never comprehensively know. In the academy, these images have long been treated as the primitive products of superstitious, religious folklore. ‘The Greek [icon] painter is the slave of the theologian… bound by tradition as the animal is to instinct,’ wrote the 19th-century French art historian Adolphe Didron. ©
Wednesday, 16 April 2025
Tuesday, 15 April 2025
Monday, 14 April 2025
Sunday, 13 April 2025
Saturday, 12 April 2025
Friday, 11 April 2025
“Mission impossible: can English translations ever measure up to Dante’s epic poem?” by Harry Cochrane (TLS)
Despite the seeming impossibility of translating Dante, so many feel compelled to try. Translation is a broad church, though, and applies across media as well. Joseph Luzzi’s Dante’s Divine Comedy: A biography gives a succinct sketch of Dante’s own afterlife – and literal sketches, at times, in the form of prints of Botticelli’s illustrations for the Commedia. (Viewers will be “swept away by the tidal force of Botticelli’s line”.) As one of the pre-eminent pop-dantisti, Luzzi does not have much to say – not to Dante scholars, at least – but he says it very well. His brushstrokes are predictably broad (“Most of the great Romantic readers of Dante were simply not interested in his Christian world”), while his examples are necessarily cherry-picked. But his later chapters especially give a rich sense of Dante’s presence in different forms, genres and media. When Victor Frankenstein rallies his pursuit force at the edge of the Arctic Circle, we are apparently reading an adaptation of the brilliant, disingenuous speech with which Ulysses urges his crew past the straits of Gibraltar (Inferno 26.112–120). ©
Thursday, 10 April 2025
Wednesday, 9 April 2025
“Rebirth of the modern: The future of art and artists in the era of artificial intelligence” by Aaron Peck (TLS)
Eno is, in many ways, an heir to a more traditional, “brandless” concept of the avant-garde. The generative music that he began making in the 1970s – which he called “as ignorable as it is interesting” – endeavoured to synthesize environment and music, an attempt of a sort to merge art and life. What Art Does is thus an unexpected extension of those sensibilities. His theory – that art allows humans to explore and engage in how they feel – conceives of artistic ideas as shared, from how we design a screwdriver to how we enjoy a picture. “When we see a new earring, or any artwork”, he writes, “we look at where this new one sits in our history of looking at artworks. It’s like being presented with the latest sentence in a long story.” ©
Tuesday, 8 April 2025
“The Chronicler of Unhappiness” by Michael Dirda (The New York Review)
In truth, for relentless and layered tricksiness, only Nabokov’s Lolita and Pale Fire can rival The Good Soldier. It employs the entire modernist playbook—a carefully orchestrated, almost fugue-like unfolding of the action, multiple time-shifts, a limited narrator, symbolic historical allusions, the speeding up and slowing down of narrative pace, foreshadowings and reversals, double entendres, and much else.
In particular, the novel’s surface text, reliant on ambiguity, foregrounds the untrustworthiness of first impressions. Dowell’s wife, for example, likes instructing people about European history, so it’s only later that one begins to wonder about the statement “At that time the Captain was quite evidently enjoying being educated by Florence.